Talk:Apito Dourado

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Documented facts only, please

The article used as reference to say that Pinto da Costa fled to Spain never says he actually fled. First of all, the word "fuga" (escape) in the title is between quotation marks, meaning it wasn't an actual escape; besides, if you can read portuguese you can see that the whole article only mentions that Carolina said they fled and Pinto da Costa was interrogated about it. It never says they actually fled. All the text is written in a conditional way: "terá revelado estar iminente a detenção", "que terá permitido a Pinto da Costa ausentar-se do país", "terá mantido esta versão", etc. Expressions like "segundo a versão da própria" or "No livro Eu Carolina, a ex-companheira de Pinto da Costa conta que" make it very clear that the text is based on what Carolina wrote and there is absolutely no evidence that it actually happened like that.

And the part about why Luís Filipe Vieira isn't being investigated as well is pure speculation and personal opinion. Nobody connected to Apito Dourado (judges, prosecutors, etc.) ever said any of that.

I know it's a polemical issue, but it's less polemical if we stick to the facts. Lampadinha 00:02, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you Lampadinha.

This is a case that should only report facts that are public and not opinions! vsnunes 12:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New section

I'd like to propose a new section on the page about the 'current situation'. It is stated, among other informations, that Pinto da Costa was suspended and Boavista relegated. Although the decisions of the LPFP are mandatory, they are not final and are subject to an appeal from the defendants.Ryszard Grodzisko (talk) 14:01, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pinto da Costa was considered not guilty (30-06-2008). 84.90.24.156 (talk) 19:03, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Major clean-up

This article needs a major clean-up of facts, references, etc. Probably also a protection against edits from unregistered users as it is prone to vandalism due to the sensitivity of the matter.--Ryszard Grodzisko (talk) 10:21, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is this long suspects list relevant?--Ryszard Grodzisko (talk) 10:21, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why was a team not involved in the alleged matches relegated?

Thanks. 69.203.78.86 (talk) 14:22, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Apito Dourado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]